Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:25:57 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey <kdk@daleco.biz> To: David J Brooks <daeg@houston.rr.com> Cc: "Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: batching port builds Message-ID: <44A57AC5.1090807@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <20060630182544.GG2111@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> References: <20060630161046.GE2111@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <200606301131.29593.daeg@houston.rr.com> <20060630182544.GG2111@tigger.digitaltorque.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: > >> If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset >> defaults for each port with options. Or you can do >> 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all the option screens for >> the port in whose directory you're currently in and all its dependencies. >> >> See 'man ports' for more information. >> >> To use those with 'portupgrade -a' will probably take some custom scripting. > > Ah, so there's no make.conf option for this? > ?? You can even set BATCH=yes in your environment. I'm pretty sure you can in make.conf, also, but IIRC you might not want to do that . . . Kevin Kinsey -- What the large print giveth, the small print taketh away.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44A57AC5.1090807>