Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:35:54 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ZFS bug: was creating ZIL ignores vfs.zfs.min_auto_ashift, should be ZIL sets improper ashift with AHCI controllers Message-ID: <545CCABA.6000707@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <545CC99B.1010302@multiplay.co.uk> References: <B731A922-3F83-4D8E-A4EA-22C5CA8A3850@sarenet.es> <9C91F97841BC4347910F206618BAA3BB9AF327D1@PAIMAIL.pai.local> <545B76EF.6050709@multiplay.co.uk> <21D2A3A9-B6C1-458F-B17F-480251E999AE@sarenet.es> <545BE3E0.4030203@multiplay.co.uk> <757B9039-8DF0-4E6A-A036-82A2143D7F45@sarenet.es> <545C9552.30207@multiplay.co.uk> <545CB43E.6040901@FreeBSD.org> <545CC99B.1010302@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/11/2014 15:31, Steven Hartland wrote: > illumos does indeed have the following restrictions for root pools according to > zfs_ioc_vdev_add > * Concatenated devices are not supported > * Intent log device is not supported > > So your right but I'm still curious if there are any reasons why we shouldn't > sync the zpool.cache file for the root pool as that seems independent to this? > The only thing I can think of is that it was an optimisation but this would > still break things like a reguid. Yeah, I'd like to see an answer as well :) -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?545CCABA.6000707>