Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:15:55 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Integration of ProPolice in FreeBSD Message-ID: <20080419001555.GA50009@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080418204738.GE4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20080418132749.GB4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200804181945.59189.max@love2party.net> <20080418204738.GE4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:47:38PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > Certainly. I would like to hear opinion from other committers if SSP > should be enabled by default. > I'm not a committer, but I'll ask a question anyway. Can you quantify the performance impact, in particular for numerically intensive codes with heavy use of libm? -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080419001555.GA50009>