Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:01:09 -0500 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: Richard Kolkovich <sarumont@sigil.org> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HD4550 DRI issues Message-ID: <1253890869.2065.39.camel@balrog.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <20090925143910.GD61689@divination.portal.sigil.org> References: <20090923210626.GC46493@magus.portal.sigil.org> <1253741283.2031.334.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <20090924145417.GA2539@magus.portal.sigil.org> <1253812603.2031.1528.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <1253814434.2031.1561.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <20090924181427.GD2539@magus.portal.sigil.org> <20090925143910.GD61689@divination.portal.sigil.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 09:39 -0500, Richard Kolkovich wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 01:14:27PM -0500, Richard Kolkovich wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:47:14PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > > > > > > You may actually need -CURRENT for this patch... I'm not certain that > > > the d_mmap2 stuff is in RC1. > > > > > > > Haha...yeah. I just replied with my compile errors on RC1. It doesn't look like the d_mmap2 > > patches (from http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=196615) apply cleanly to > > RC1. I'll grab a copy of -CURRENT and hope my 8-RC1 userland plays well with the -CURRENT kernel... > > Same results with a -CURRENT kernel (with your patch). I've attached the xorg log. Let me know if > you think it would matter if I tried a -CURRENT userland, too. Ok, a few questions then.... i386 or amd64? how much ram? SMP or UP? Please show the output of sysctl hw.dri.0 along with a matching xorg.log. My current configuration is amd64/SMP/4GB with a PCI-E HD4650. So it really baffles me how/why some people run into this, where the ring contents are not zeroed. robert. -- Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1253890869.2065.39.camel>