Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 12:08:59 -0300 (ART) From: Fernando Gleiser <fgleiser@cactus.fi.uba.ar> To: Mike Jeays <Mike.Jeays@rogers.com> Cc: 'Baron Fujimoto' <baron@lava.net> Subject: RE: [WAAAY OT] Message-ID: <20040703120625.J11293@cactus.fi.uba.ar> In-Reply-To: <1088731833.51017.10.camel@chaucer> References: <005201c45fcd$93c32270$6501a8c0@Nomad> <1088731833.51017.10.camel@chaucer>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Mike Jeays wrote: > I am afraid it doesn't stand for impedance. It is the symbol used for > current throughout electromagnetic theory, and I don't think it does > stand for an English word. It isn't impedance. impedance is equivalent to resistance in mixed (with both reactive (capacitors/inductors) and resistive components) circuits exited with alternating current. I is for "current Intensity". Fer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040703120625.J11293>