Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:27:28 +0800
From:      Archy Cho <archycho@gmail.com>
To:        Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com>
Cc:        net@freebsd.org, rizzo@iet.unipi.it
Subject:   Re: Freebsd 10.2 amd64 netmap ipfw
Message-ID:  <395800C2-6ED1-42CF-A788-64D5192DE4C0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7337D8A6-B708-425B-B5B3-9E8FFBB8C411@gmail.com>
References:  <803EEF77-2371-4F1C-9251-0BCB47897879@gmail.com> <70A66D48-19E8-4C32-B2A7-5173C82CE3C1@netgate.com> <7337D8A6-B708-425B-B5B3-9E8FFBB8C411@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Professor Luigi=20

After I read the past mailing list , I got it working now ,=20
but I have something to ask.

Quote from=20
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2014-November/040380.html =
<http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2014-November/040380.html>=

WITHOUT kipfw you will be OUT of communication. If you want to have
communication without kipfw please configure if_bridge(4) properly.
My testing boxes , I could communicate with bridge + kipfw ,=20
but not without bridge , is that normal ? ( I have tested , after kipfw =
with bridge , filtering rules still could be applied )

And do kipfw could be enable as multithread for a single bridge to =
provide better performance ?

Thank you so much .

Archy Cho


> Archy Cho <archycho@gmail.com> =A9=F3 2015=A6~10=A4=EB10=A4=E9 =
=A4U=A4=C89:20 =BCg=B9D=A1G
>=20
> Dear Jim and all
>=20
> My map as follow:
>=20
> +---------------------+            +---------------------------------+ =
            +------------------------+
> | Cisco Router        |            | Freebsd 10.2 amd64 custom kernel| =
            | Linux box with         |
> | IP 10.0.85.1/30     |            | recompiled with "device netmap" | =
            | IP 172.16.0.1/30       |
> |                     | +--------->+ ix0 =3D 10.0.85.2/30              =
| <-----------+ control the Freebsd box=20
> |                     |            | ix1 =3D down                      =
|             | via ssh                |
> |                     |            | igb0 =3D 172.16.0.2/30            =
|             |                        |
> +---------------------+            +---------------------------------+ =
            +------------------------+
>=20
> 1) I have recompiled the kernel with device netmap
> 2) I downloaded the next.zip and compiled got the kipfw and ipfw
> 3) I connect via linux box , ssh 172.16.0.2
>=20
> Do anyone advise , how could I enable netmap ipfw to filter traffic =
from Cisco Router ?
>=20
> Archy Cho
>=20
>> Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com <mailto:jim@netgate.com>> =A9=F3 =
2015=A6~10=A4=EB10=A4=E9 =A4W=A4=C81:14 =BCg=B9D=A1G
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 7:14 AM, Archy Cho <archycho@gmail.com =
<mailto:archycho@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> I think I must misunderstand something , could anyone send me =
advise?
>>> Or any documents could help to build a NETMAP IPFW firewall box ?
>>=20
>> See the last several paragraphs of:=20
>>=20
>> https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap-ipfw/blob/next/README =
<https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap-ipfw/blob/next/README>;
>>=20
>> Note that the "telnet localhost 5566" traffic generator hack =
mentioned in the README doesn't work without a recompile, but you won't =
need it for running real traffic.
>>=20
>> Jim
>>=20
>=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?395800C2-6ED1-42CF-A788-64D5192DE4C0>