Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:31:51 -0700 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Adding options to RPI-B Message-ID: <42C259D6-F652-417A-80B5-536893D6D642@felyko.com> In-Reply-To: <2C57A72F-0CB3-41DF-B0E5-1509348128BD@freebsd.org> References: <CALCpEUEV2woA3qmQEGQCR0tZ%2B2fMX0xObw3b4F8_MDh51mODDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmoni3HTEsxXPh=7mrqJkZbX%2B6gPyAbaC7_P6F3m-E1H%2Bvg@mail.gmail.com> <2C57A72F-0CB3-41DF-B0E5-1509348128BD@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 Jul 2013, at 08:29, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Jul 23, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> .. I'd rather we just make modules support work, and start shipping >> stripped down kernels w/ modules. > > I've used modules; as far as I can tell, they work just fine. > The status quo is historical legacy. > >> We have loader support for arm, right? :) > > Would someone please commit the change to the > RPi kernel config to enable all modules by default? > > That will let us verify the current status before we start > removing things that are currently static. Done, r253634. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42C259D6-F652-417A-80B5-536893D6D642>