Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 10:54:59 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates and debug.max_softdeps Message-ID: <199912311854.KAA84956@apollo.backplane.com> References: <19991231004902.01D721CA0@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:FYI: On hub.freebsd.org (the freebsd mailing list server), if we activate
:softupdates on the disk containing the postfix spool, the machine reboots
:(silently if I recall correctly) within 5 minutes of postfix starting up.
:
:This is a much smaller system of course, with smaller memory and filesystem
:working set. (postfix spool of ~50-80MB, 256MB ram). I thought I'd post
:this as a real-use datapoint.
:Cheers,
:-Peter
:--
:Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au
:...
:Tom wrote:
:> Yes, postmark operates on the same file set. I used the following
:> postmark settings:
:>
:> set number 30000
:> set transactions 4000000
:> set size 1500 200000
:...
I'm running the postmark test on my 3.x and 4.x test boxes now using
a large softupdates partition (33G on each) and large memory (512M and 1G)
configuration.
The 4.x box seems to have stabilized at around 14MB of KVM, the 3.x box
seems to have stabilized at around 9MB of KVM. I'll leave it running
for a while to see if there are any memory leaks and then try reducing
debug.max_softdeps to see what happens.
We are still looking for panic messages.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912311854.KAA84956>