Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:59:38 -0700
From:      Brian Gardner <openjdk@getsnappy.com>
To:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: java/jdk16 vulnerability?
Message-ID:  <57EA4E37-8064-47B7-B101-2FB3E183714A@getsnappy.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090929034837.GA56588@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
References:  <20090928101048.GA1189@phenom.cordula.ws> <20090929034837.GA56588@misty.eyesbeyond.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
openjdk6 b17 is coming soon, and should fix these vulnerabilities.

On Sep 28, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Greg Lewis wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:10:48PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
>> Freenet (http://www.freenetproject.org/) on my FreeBSD/amd64 system
>> complains about an old and vulnerable Java version:
>>
>>  Your installed version of Java is vulnerable to a severe remote
>>  exploit (remote code execution!). You must upgrade to at least Java
>>  5 update 20 or Java 6 update 15 as soon as possible. Freenet has
>>  disabled any plugins handling XML for the time being, but this
>>  includes searching and chat so you should upgrade ASAP!
>
> We're almost certainly vulnerable.  The jdk16 port is at Update 3.
>
>>  See http://www.cert.fi/en/reports/2009/vulnerability2009085.html for
>>  details.
>>
>>  Also, please do not use Thaw or Freetalk. The UPnP plugin is
>>  enabled, it might present a risk if you have bad guys on your LAN,
>>  but without it Freenet will not be able to port forward and will
>>  have severe problems.
>>
>> I'm running java/jdk16:
>>
>> phenom# java -version
>> java version "1.6.0_03-p4"
>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_03-p4- 
>> root_08_sep_2009_17_05-b00)
>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0_03-p4- 
>> root_08_sep_2009_17_05-b00, mixed mode)
>>
>> On 7.2-STABLE:
>>
>> phenom# uname -a
>> FreeBSD phenom.cordula.ws 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #0: Tue  
>> Sep  8 10:43:26 CEST 2009     root@phenom.cordula.ws:/usr/obj/usr/ 
>> src/sys/GENERIC  amd64
>>
>> Is that version of Java really vulnerable? If yes, why doesn't
>>  # portaudit -Fda
>> report it as such, and could you please update the java/jdk16 port?
>
> We need an entry in the VUXML database I guess.
>
> Updating java/jdk16 is going to be a slow process.  There are lots of
> changes between Update 3 and Update 15.  I've partially merged  
> Update 4,
> but obviously that still leaves many to go...
>
> -- 
> Greg Lewis                          Email   : glewis@eyesbeyond.com
> Eyes Beyond                         Web     : http:// 
> www.eyesbeyond.com
> Information Technology              FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java- 
> unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57EA4E37-8064-47B7-B101-2FB3E183714A>