Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Feb 2000 23:05:35 -0600
From:      Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
To:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: /usr/ports/ too big?
Message-ID:  <00021323080008.06543@nomad.dataplex.net>
In-Reply-To: <20000213201132.B17462@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002132042570.23833-100000@picnic.mat.net> <00021321052504.06543@nomad.dataplex.net> <20000213201132.B17462@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 08:19:07PM -0600, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> > > The machine is a pentium 120; maybe if things get worse sometime, the
> > 
> > However, we could be giving much more frequent service if we were
> > working from a smaller tree.
> 
> You could give much more frequent service if you replaced the
> !!_P5-120_!! (which you can buy used for $75) with something of modern
> horse power.  Geez, a P5-120 is too slow so lets labotimize the input??

It's not the CPU as much as it is the HD. The process is very I/O bound.
So much for $0.08/gig mass storage :-)
-- 
Richard Wackerbarth
rkw@Dataplex.NET



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00021323080008.06543>