Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 May 2003 14:58:28 -0500
From:      Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
To:        misha <misha@research.att.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: signal usage in Pthread
Message-ID:  <20030509195827.GB94321@dan.emsphone.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EBBF029.9EE9031B@research.att.com>
References:  <3EBBF029.9EE9031B@research.att.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (May 09), misha said:
> I am trying to port a multithreaded  application from Linux to
> FreeBSD; the application uses SIGUNUSED signal (because Linux threads
> utilize SIGUSR1 and 2 for themselves). I am considering replacing
> SIGUNUSED with SIGUSR1 but am concerned if FreeBSD threads aren't
> using them also.
> 
> Does anyone know if either user-level threads ( gcc -Pthread) or
> kernel threads (gcc -kthread) use SIGUSR1 in a way that would
> preclude using it in the application?

libc_r (-pthread) uses SIGPROF for its scheduling signal, so you should
be safe.  There hasn't been a -kthread option for a long time.

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@allantgroup.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030509195827.GB94321>