Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 00:49:20 +0900 From: Shigeyuki Fukushima (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCSiFFZ0xQRzcbKEI=?=) <shige@FreeBSD.org> To: sheldonh@starjuice.net Cc: shige@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_X vs. WITHOUT_X11 vs. NO_X Message-ID: <20010604155420560.WOQQ.24728.t-mta3.odn.ne.jp@mta3.odn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <7782.991637382@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> References: <15127.62143.888966.869172@guru.mired.org> <7782.991637382@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Subject: Re: WITHOUT_X vs. WITHOUT_X11 vs. NO_X Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 08:49:42 +0200 Hello. > Guys, whether we use WITHOUT_X11 or WITHOUT_X, changes will have to be > made. Since WITHOUT_X makes a little bit more sense than WITHOUT_X11, > let's just make the changes and be done with it. I think so, too :) If we want to control ports by X VERSION, we sould use XFREE86_VERSION or such new variables. :) And, I think that we should use XFree86's Version rather than `X' Version. :) # But now, XFREE86_VERSION has only major version for XFree86... --- shige To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010604155420560.WOQQ.24728.t-mta3.odn.ne.jp>