Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Sep 1997 08:51:52 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net>
To:        Andrew Gordon <arg@arg1.demon.co.uk>
Cc:        Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, hackers@freebsd.org, Troy Curtiss <troyc@sandy.merix.com>, Michael Reifenberger <root@totum.plaut.de>
Subject:   Re: lpr/lpd and HP networked printers
Message-ID:  <199709231241.IAA08760@gatekeeper.itribe.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970923001957.29070A-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes you need a firmware upgrade.  I have a 4mv here that I had to upgrade
to turn off the banners.

On Tue, 23 Sep 1997, Andrew Gordon wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Sep 1997, J Wunsch [and others!] wrote:
> > As Andrew Gordon wrote:
> > 
> > > This is easy enough to fix, though it is not obvious which is the 
> > > correct way. There are a number of possibilities:
> > 
> > 6)	Telnet to your JetDirect, and turn off banner pages.  That's
> > 	how i always did it.
> 
> Well, I have now tried the three printers that I can access remotely,
> and none of them support this (they support the telnet prompt for 
> configuration, but banners are not one of the available options; I tried 
> typing the suggested "banner:0" in case it was an undocumented feature,
> but that gave me an error).  These three machines are various different
> models of laserjet 4 (4M, 4M+ etc.), aged between 2 and 4 years old.
> Maybe there has been a firmware upgrade since; I certainly spent plenty
> of effort (including talking to HP support) trying to find a way to
> disable it at the time the first one was installed, but to no avail.
> 
> Also, I have since spoken to someone with an Intel NetPort Express
> (an external ethernet interface for ordinary parallel/serial printers),
> and he has the exact same problem, again with no obvious means to
> turn off the banner in the configuration.  In both that case and the
> HP, it responds correctly to the banner controls in the lpr protocol.
> 
> So, I still think a change to lpr/lpd would be useful, though so far
> it looks like I am in a minority of 1....
> 

Jamie Bowden
System Administrator, iTRiBE.net

Abusenet: The Misinformation Superhighway




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709231241.IAA08760>