Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 16:27:32 +0100 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UNIX-like approach to software and system architecture (Was: D J Bernstein) Message-ID: <20010204162732.A50591@lpt.ens.fr> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010204080917.049ecca0@localhost>; from brett@lariat.org on Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 08:14:38AM -0700 References: <20010203135902.M94275@lpt.ens.fr> <200102022245.PAA15968@usr08.primenet.com> <20010202140505.B91552@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200102022245.PAA15968@usr08.primenet.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010203110403.048e78e0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20010204080917.049ecca0@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brett Glass said on Feb 4, 2001 at 08:14:38: > Interestingly, Theo De Raadt also seems to agree that djb's approach to > DNS daemons is more sensible and secure than ISC's. In his own words: I believe OpenBSD avoided the recent BIND bug, but they still bundle their version of BIND 4.x because they aren't satisfied about the security of later versions. Do they plan to work on a BIND substitute, or pick up djbdns? DJB himself seems to favour OpenBSD as an operating system. R To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010204162732.A50591>