Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 12:47:04 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt <sos@DeepCore.dk> Cc: release@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there still sufficient reason for hw.ata.atapi_dma being 0 by default? Message-ID: <m3pt6csbbr.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <410A9D77.4030703@DeepCore.dk> =?iso-8859-15?Q?=28S=F8ren?= Schmidt's message of "Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:11:51 %2B0200") References: <410A3833.7030502@portaone.com> <410A47C7.1080808@DeepCore.dk> <410A9B58.8000502@mac.com> <410A9D77.4030703@DeepCore.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
S=F8ren Schmidt <sos@DeepCore.dk> writes: > Actually not, most if not all modern fast burners implements some sort > of "burn proof" ie no coasters at all due to buffer underruns... These modes still generate a small burst error because a few pits and lands will be spoilt, particularly with older "burn proof" drives. It's best to avoid buffer underruns even with "burn proof" turned on, for quality's sake. --=20 Matthias Andree Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 (PGP/MIME preferred)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3pt6csbbr.fsf>