Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:08:12 +0100
From:      "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de>
To:        Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Subject:   ZFS on labelled partitions (was: Re: LSI SAS2008 mps driver preferred firmware version)
Message-ID:  <878D84A9-4553-413B-ACA4-5ABF499F28C1@punkt.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ49A8b6g=mQL3jzJaNX-Lf%2BuDCvmscyB6F4tr7Ax=HMbg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <5644FF09.9090200@free.de> <CA%2BE3k93QrUFA3BvhoswkVDXh2bR2aLYG6Z0TOrisVvNL=%2BMZVA@mail.gmail.com> <56472686.5030301@free.de> <20151114143104.GA41119@in-addr.com> <7710CBCC-E68F-4454-9E29-E50ED1C6B511@sarenet.es> <CAN6yY1sH0PnnF_AGwDsA75i_Z6ptOr4J0c_Gqrt%2BRFO6eZsW-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ4Js65gQZc6rbT9SKg-jZozziTa=JGpJys6HyejdgWP%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <20151116205734.GM48728@zxy.spb.ru> <CAOjFWZ49A8b6g=mQL3jzJaNX-Lf%2BuDCvmscyB6F4tr7Ax=HMbg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_1B2B703B-9A6A-4088-B7E0-8CC3E339EA61
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

Hi, all,

> Am 16.11.2015 um 22:19 schrieb Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>:
>=20
> =E2=80=8BYou label the disks as they are added to the system the first =
time.  That
> way, you always know where each disk is located, and you only deal =
with the
> labels.

we do the same for obvious reasons. But I always wonder about the =
possible
downsides, because ZFS documentation explicitly states:

	ZFS operates on raw devices, so it is possible to create a =
storage pool comprised of logical
	volumes, either software or hardware. This configuration is not =
recommended, as ZFS works
	best when it uses raw physical devices. Using logical volumes =
might sacrifice performance,
	reliability, or both, and should be avoided.

(from http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/819-5461/gbcik/index.html)

Can anyone shed some lght on why not using raw devices might sacrifice
performance or reliability? Or is this just outdated folklore?

Thanks,
Patrick
--
punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe
Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100
info@punkt.de       http://www.punkt.de
Gf: J=C3=BCrgen Egeling      AG Mannheim 108285


--Apple-Mail=_1B2B703B-9A6A-4088-B7E0-8CC3E339EA61
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWSuBsAAoJEJBvLuLt2olcScMH/1VvysKjTcZqVOIltP1FyZWn
LzaS3uGKVPNJKYKmL6fl0oluynUhFdupvPqLT8qI5ViMe6lpA6ay9dCZ2uhdcOhS
mu2qT8orRTSNWr4DZmpuH0lxulYypEcBGN0oxwokcTuv3imVE1iMSBFnUoNWS1NT
cf/jBREsixk3YFr2Az7cKG80Jcnp/T2sPrTMQV1UWvkz4qe1JEUCU5VflUhPEH56
CJpp5U1647nrlvqmsv5XZgENtA3QGN2WrhFei56C1wGRkrmqDGy81WQzQAaVsPbD
t6JgaOJaFKB+m4S1T3Ar0Qf96rp6/mm+/f96fCaurzK4oBuHSuuaJPs5cHUPke4=
=MTIy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_1B2B703B-9A6A-4088-B7E0-8CC3E339EA61--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?878D84A9-4553-413B-ACA4-5ABF499F28C1>