Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:59:28 -0500 (EST) From: Pat Lynch <lynch@bsdunix.net> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Jamie Bowden <ragnar@sysabend.org>, Eric Wayte <ewayte@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What result would *you* like from the merger? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10003140958120.19463-100000@bytor.rush.net> In-Reply-To: <20000314061321.C14789@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
irix nfs interoperability kinda sucks actually. the problems I had btwn linux and irix, irix and freebsd, sun and irix, oh man, not fun. Sun tends to work with most things. (believe it or not, I've had pretty reliable performance from freebsd's nfs *shrug*) -Pat __ Pat Lynch lynch@rush.net lynch@bsdunix.net lynch@unix.sh lynch@blowfi.sh Systems Administrator Rush Networking On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jamie Bowden <ragnar@sysabend.org> [000314 06:06] wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Eric Wayte wrote: > > > > :Everyone is talking about the merger, so I thought I'd start a new thread: > > : > > :What would you like to see from the merger? > > > > Enn Eff Ess. BSD/OS has working client and server locking that works, or > > at least, that's what I hear. I'm looking at roughly 20k for an Origin200 > > to build a file server on. I could do it with FreeBSD for a quarter of > > this if I could count on NFS. > > Please if anything, go with Sun. IRIX nfs is nice, but not nearly as > good as sun's implementation. > > -Alfred > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10003140958120.19463-100000>