Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Jun 2017 16:20:44 +0200
From:      Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
To:        Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Passing a limited amount of disk devices to jails
Message-ID:  <593AAEBC.7050701@quip.cz>
In-Reply-To: <77f2e146-b0c8-00ba-117b-b4385f355be6@digiware.nl>
References:  <edc6787a-256f-1027-0008-6d5dfa10d651@digiware.nl> <109608ec-2fc2-1f04-3dcc-0056f243639c@multiplay.co.uk> <77f2e146-b0c8-00ba-117b-b4385f355be6@digiware.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Willem Jan Withagen wrote on 2017/06/09 15:48:
> On 9-6-2017 11:23, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> You could do effectively this by using dedicated zfs filesystems per jail
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> That is how I'm going to do it, when nothing else works.
> But then I don't get to test the part of building the ceph-cluster from
> raw disk...
>
> I was more thinking along the lines of tinkering with the devd.conf or
> something. And would appreciate opinions on how to (not) do it.

I totally skipped devd.conf in my mind in previous reply. So maybe you 
can really use devd.conf to allow access to /dev/adaX devices or you can 
use ZFS zvol if you have big pool and need some smaller devices to test 
with.

Miroslav Lachman




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?593AAEBC.7050701>