Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:03:18 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> To: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@wait4.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>, ports@freebsd.org, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> Subject: Re: what is gio-fam? Message-ID: <200804151003.18644.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20080415095514.ef3e6e2b.rnsanchez@wait4.org> References: <20080414214750.699014501A@ptavv.es.net> <200804141843.22770.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <20080415095514.ef3e6e2b.rnsanchez@wait4.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=D7=A6=D7=D4=CF=D2=CF=CB 15 =CB=D7=A6=D4=C5=CE=D8 2008 08:55 =C4=CF, Ricard= o Nabinger Sanchez =F7=C9 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC=C9: > Not quite. =9AI also faced this, but was lucky to discover in time (not > closing any open app) where this dependency was coming from. =9AThe only = port > I had to update was glib, a couple of times, and gio-fam was finally buil= t. > This was instinctive, but worked. "A couple of times"? Congratulations... One should not need this luck, nor this instinct, however. Until I decide to upgrade gnome, all other gnome-using ports should be cont= ent=20 with the version of gnome I already have... This is all patently obvious, I might add. The automatic gio-fam dependency= =20 should be made smarter and/or optional (depending on which gnome is already= =20 installed). Going forward, one hopes, gnome-team will not be so cavalier in forcing=20 upgrades... -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200804151003.18644.mi%2Bmill>