Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214338] [PATCH] devel/glib20: new kqueue() backend for file monitoring Message-ID: <bug-214338-6497-bxNkd6hbbN@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-214338-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-214338-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214338 --- Comment #52 from lightside <lightside@gmx.com> --- Need to note, that I just proposed some changes related to integration of t= his PR's proposal for current devel/glib20 port (based on ports r469308 and por= ts r473551 changes). I saw, that PR's reporter also proposed to replace existing gio/kqueue back= end on: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1460 I maybe wrong, but I guess, this may be counterproductive, if consider amou= nt of other people's work for existing gio/kqueue backend, some of which maybe against of replacing it for some reason(s). Probably, possible to propose t= hese changes as an alternative backend, for example as an additional gio's sub-directory (e.g. there are gio/inotify (see bug #199872, comment #26, wh= ere it was possible), gio/kqueue, etc.). But this may require to adapt it for existing build system(s). So, other people may test/use this backend, if needed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-214338-6497-bxNkd6hbbN>