Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 06:05:48 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page Message-ID: <20060607030548.GD72368@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6WlEvdN9Dv0WHSBl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:48:05PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Portupgrade ideas page was created on our wiki server: > http://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade >=20 > I would like to hear your ideas, wishes and comments. > --=20 > Dixi. > Sem. This was relevant at least some time ago, and, I think, still holds. In fact, this is my biggest issue with portupgrade. When installing new port, portupgrade shall install all dependencies itself. This way customization of the ports knobs in pkgtools.conf would be honored. I do not know whether this could be done by changes to portupgrade only or the help from the ports infrastructure is required. --6WlEvdN9Dv0WHSBl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEhkKLC3+MBN1Mb4gRAvolAKDZ3GWoEatB5sxZmO9C8clTj8MCCQCdHoyo rKgRj6r5cQ0yXEdxA0YbpjA= =bWAG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6WlEvdN9Dv0WHSBl--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060607030548.GD72368>