Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Jun 95 16:20:02 JST
From:      Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp>
To:        David Greenman <davidg@freefall.cdrom.com>
Cc:        davidg@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com, soda@sra.co.jp
Subject:   Re: Changed information for PR kern/490
Message-ID:  <9506080720.AA11703@sran230.sra.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <199506060736.AAA07227@freefall.cdrom.com>
References:  <199506060736.AAA07227@freefall.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Tue, 6 Jun 1995 00:36:57 -0700,
	David Greenman <davidg@freefall.cdrom.com> said:

> Synopsis: 2.0.5-ALPHA should change msync(2) syscall number for compatibility
> State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
> State-Changed-By: davidg
> State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 6 00:30:22 PDT 1995
> State-Changed-Why: 

	:
> The above combinations of factors was the reason for deciding not
> to allocate a new syscall number to msync(). This was a deliberate
> decision and not a bug.

I have not know that it is decided under carefull consideration.
Thank you for detailed explanation.
--
soda@sra.co.jp		Software Research Associates, Inc., Japan
(Noriyuki Soda)		   software tools and technology group



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9506080720.AA11703>