Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:07:53 +0800 From: "Vanilla I. Shu" <vanilla@fatpipi.cirx.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Vanilla I. Shu" <vanilla@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/p5-Spiffy Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20040812070753.GA56764@fatpipi.cirx.org> In-Reply-To: <B45A26D957669101958E0B99@[192.168.1.51]> References: <20040812064738.5AB4416A4CE@hub.freebsd.org> <B45A26D957669101958E0B99@[192.168.1.51]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 08:54:05AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > perl@ was the maintainer, why not let it there ? > I'm using Spiffy, I'm a perl@ one, and I'm keeping an eye on it. when I import this ports, submitter have no too much time to maintain, so I set MAINTAINER to perl@, and now I thank ports@ will be better then perl@. should I set it back to perl@? -- I'm a perl@ one too.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040812070753.GA56764>