Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:35:00 -0000 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ability for maintainers to update own ports Message-ID: <20031112093456.GE506@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> In-Reply-To: <200311102306.41300.linimon@lonesome.com> References: <1068458390.38101.19.camel@dirk.no.domain> <3FB00E53.8060603@fillmore-labs.com> <200311102005.30163.linimon@lonesome.com> <200311102306.41300.linimon@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# linimon@lonesome.com / 2003-11-10 23:06:41 -0600:
> I tweaked my ports monitoring code, and it now generates the following
> statistics:
>
> Total number of ports: 9629
> Number of ports with no maintainer: 2519 (26.2%)
> Ports with no maintainer and build errors in at least one build environment:
> 423 (4.39%)
> Ports with no maintainer and outstanding PRs: 135 (1.40%)
> Union of the above two ("ports in need of attention" in my shorthand): 520
> (5.40%)
>
> So there's some statistics for folks to ponder about. If you want to help
> FreeBSD's ports collection, that "423" number surely looks like a good
> place to start.
what is the number of ports with maintainer-submitted PR's
lying in GNATS for longer than a month?
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031112093456.GE506>