Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:01:33 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) Message-ID: <CADLo839Gay=psgysBF7hx0REQC82VyDZdKOmdotMPXL75Q98Kw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 January 2012 20:31, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.20111108 to >> gcc-4.4.7.20120117 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 lang/gcc46 >> gcc-4.4.7.20111108 >> >> (What is the preceding line -- with the ">>" -- and the similar one >> below, supposed to be indicating exactly? =A0If it means what I think it >> does, then it seems as if portmaster is misinterpreting the intention >> of the "-o" option) > > No, it means that the ports framework is seeing 4.4 as a dependency of > 4.6 for some reason. I've seen that happen in the past when non-base gcc > was in use, but have never had anyone track down the cause > authoritatively. Obviously make.conf is a suspect, but I'm assuming you > already looked there. Often happens when people stick USE_something into make.conf :) (don't do that) Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo839Gay=psgysBF7hx0REQC82VyDZdKOmdotMPXL75Q98Kw>