Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:28:28 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND 8.2.3 upgrade available Message-ID: <14966.56732.156003.558368@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20010129164711.K26076@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010129143300.A38419@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010129153144.H26076@fw.wintelcom.net> <14966.3324.107528.104198@horsey.gshapiro.net> <20010129164711.K26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG> [010129 16:38] wrote: > > bright> Is there any chance that the bind and sendmail people could backport > > bright> -DNO_SENDMAIL and -DNO_NAMED to 3.x (and maybe 2.x)? > > > > What does the BIND bug have to do with sendmail? > > It was related in that, the sendmail and bind shipped with 2.2.x > and 3.x is pretty bad, and upgrades shouldn't get clobbered by make > world in case there's a system change. > > It's nice to be able to clobber the /usr instead of installing into > /usr/local for older versions of FreeBSD. Why? I've got a number of 2.x/3.x systems, and it's trivial just to stick them in /usr/local. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14966.56732.156003.558368>