Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 16:40:20 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ImageMagick bump Message-ID: <1178397620.55607.19.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20070505190103.GB21388@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070505170012.GA62735@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178389743.55607.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505183147.GA20810@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178389962.55607.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505185138.GA21388@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178391323.55607.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505190103.GB21388@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-wQ9cHo9WLzHRRya/6dAU Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 15:01 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:55:23PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:51 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:32:42PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:31 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:29:03PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote= : > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:00 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > > It looks like ImageMagick depends on fontconfig but didnt get= bumped, > > > > > > > can you confirm? > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > Also I wonder about ports that have optional dependencies on > > > > > > > fontconfig, we should probably bump them too to be safe (othe= rwise > > > > > > > people will have stale references to /usr/X11R6 in .la files = again) > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Actually, ImageMagick should have been bumped, but was not. Th= ere are > > > > > > only two ports by my count that have fontconfig as an optional = disabled > > > > > > dependency. I will recheck my script to see why some ports wer= e not > > > > > > bumped. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Thanks! > > > >=20 > > > > I found the problem. My script didn't take DISTVERSION into accoun= t. I > > > > will send out a new, complete tarball shortly. > > >=20 > > > Maybe a diff against previous bumpage would be better, if > > > possible...flz? > >=20 > > That would be very hard to generate at this point. I mean, it would be > > trivial if I was allowed to re-bump the ports that had already been > > bumped. Otherwise I'd have to manually fiddle with my list. >=20 > OK, I guess flz will just have to cope :) New diffs are up: http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/ports_xorg.diff.bz2 (full diff) http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/ports_xorg_incr.diff.bz2 (incremental diff on top of last diff) Joe >=20 > Kris >=20 --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-wQ9cHo9WLzHRRya/6dAU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGPOuzb2iPiv4Uz4cRAoYcAJ9Z+FRyX0fUOWB7Y4f2pavnumIm0wCgj/5j bQHBDk7mfgC9m+3wyYpfyu8= =uu5M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wQ9cHo9WLzHRRya/6dAU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1178397620.55607.19.camel>