Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:24:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Don <don@calis.blacksun.org> To: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov> Cc: Ilia Chipitsine <ilia@cgilh.chel.su>, Chuck Youse <cyouse@paradox.nexuslabs.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9910271722460.35683-100000@calis.blacksun.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.10.9910271324180.671784-100000@acl.lanl.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > as far as I remember ext2 has some "counter". I used to use Linux and > > it performed 'fsck' from time to time (even if fs was clearly unmounted). > > that is a very good thing to have. linux performed a fsck on every 16th boot afaik. This may have been changed but that is how often it occurred when I used linux. This had more to do with the file system becoming fragmented than with it becoming inconsistent. (dont quote me on that.) -don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9910271722460.35683-100000>