Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:02:04 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TDFS ... or other distributed file system technologies for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <evgfum$5pb$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070408014234.GP79199@beastie.creo.hu> References: <4746DA006C148BC0FF1241C6@ganymede.hub.org> <euberg$f1u$1@sea.gmane.org> <45CCECCB7ECB612F504211F3@ganymede.hub.org> <eubmlt$fgp$1@sea.gmane.org> <slrnf0ngu5.2ffc.csaba-ml@beastie.creo.hu> <B2E0F21904E37E10992B1941@ganymede.hub.org> <20070408014234.GP79199@beastie.creo.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig52E8C44A99743BD0857B0707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Csaba Henk wrote: > I didn't mean I won't maintain (keep code in sync with the rest of the > kernel, fix bugs, etc.). I just said I can't work on new features ATM. Of the new feature, file locking (flock()) is very disireable, when you get the time :) Also, do you know if file locking will work "locally", even if FUSE doesn't handle it? (By locally I mean: automagically for files that are assumed to be local to the machine / kernel). --------------enig52E8C44A99743BD0857B0707 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGG8MTldnAQVacBcgRArIBAJ4nXdvAobOUdB4OnNk7Kpe6+3FsEwCg+SBB I3JpVcj4vOhcQs4nQgLjElo= =Eyn/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig52E8C44A99743BD0857B0707--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?evgfum$5pb$1>