Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:53:27 +0000
From:      Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Michael Schuster <michaelsprivate@gmail.com>, "Oleg V. Nauman" <oleg@theweb.org.ua>
Cc:        freeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: "make" in ports tells me "requires kernel source files in SRC_BASE=/usr/src." despite an up-to-date /usr/src
Message-ID:  <a71737ff-39f6-21ec-a4aa-a542aa70ce49@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADqw_gL=9hY77i+nG6YCsVEFEzce0PngfrY9U_RYC2rrwD1MeQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CADqw_gKG6ovTuN7bZvYy7PCydfCXH4M2fw68YLmLvZhxi-g2xw@mail.gmail.com> <601d6f51-e3e5-a780-332a-95648fe87168@yuripv.dev> <2281312.bDOn7JOVgO@sigill.theweb.org.ua> <CADqw_gL=9hY77i+nG6YCsVEFEzce0PngfrY9U_RYC2rrwD1MeQ@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 08/02/2021 20:10, Michael Schuster wrote:

> $ bectl list
> BE                             Active Mountpoint Space Created
> [...]
> BE_20210206_175312_CURRENT14   NR     /          30.8G 2021-02-06 17:53
> BE_20210208_204901_CURRENT_14  -      /mnt       860K  2021-02-08 20:49
> 
> ... which, as I found out, does NOT include /usr/src; only after creating a
> snapshot of same and mounting that specifically:

There's an important difference between beadm and bectl which seems 
relevant here.  beadm defaults to accepting a tree of ZFSes as a boot 
environment, whereas bectl only applies to the ZFS at the top level of 
the boot environment unless you use the -r flag.

I don't know why the difference was introduced, since bectl was 
specifically written as a drop-in replacement for beadm, and the 
recursive behaviour of beadm is generally what you'ld want if you have 
several ZFSes per boot environment and entirely harmless if you only 
have a single ZFS per BE.

	Cheers,

	Matthew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a71737ff-39f6-21ec-a4aa-a542aa70ce49>