Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:24:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6724@bellsouth.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: dbn@freebsd.org Subject: wine (-devel) and i386-wine Message-ID: <986583.59626.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I read something about two days on www.freshports.org about wine and i386-wine that alters my plans. I tried to build i386-wine from i386 with the idea of using it both from i386 and amd64, in the latter case mounting the i386 partition on /compat/i386. But what I see makes that look not feasible. If I want to run wine from both i386 and amd64 (not at the same time), do I need to make separate installations on separate partitions? In that case, how do I avoid wasteful duplication in compiling? I am getting ready to rebuild/update FreeBSD-current and possibly 10.0-STABLE from source, am planning to also make a new i386 installation on a hard drive in a USB 2.0 and eSATA enclosure, using eSATA. I want to do this soon, at least for FreeBSD-current because, after running svn up on FreeBSD src tree from NetBSD, I saw an update in $SRCDIR/sys/dev/re/if_re.c and want to see if that works on my Ethernet. I also want the new NFS improvements. Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?986583.59626.bm>