Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:24:53 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC 4.1/gfortran 4.1 on FreeBSD 6/AMD64? Message-ID: <20060911212453.GA1441@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609112319020.31634@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609041615270.28097@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20060907230525.202054fb@serene.no-ip.org> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609112319020.31634@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:19:41PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > I've had no particular problems building either gcc 4.1 or 4.2 > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > except that the gcj compiler bombs with an error message about a missing > > "spec" file (I have no idea what such a file is supposed to contain). > > Hmm, I thought that GCJ does not fully work on FreeBSD/AMD64 yet? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25652 > Well, if someone in the Java camp would actually commit the patch in that PR, gcj would have a better shot at working. The PR also says the patch is based on a patch from the freebsd port. Looks like a catch-22. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060911212453.GA1441>