Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:11:50 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, John Indra <john@office.naver.co.id>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Message-ID: <200102130111.f1D1BpU56116@mobile.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200102130052.f1D0qFW33330@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote: > In message <xzplmrbo1b2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > : Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> writes: > : > I'd rather see this patch, or something similar, than bump the major > : > version again. We can phase in a better way to obviate the need to do > : > this in the future. > : > : Brian Feldman, Peter Wemm, David O'Brien and myself have been > : discussing possible solutions on IRC for the past two hours. Peter > : will likely commit a patch sometime soon. > > If there's something better than Daniel's solution that doesn't > require a major bump and is compatible with the old libc.so.5 api, > then I'm all for that. I'd love to test it out as well if there's any > desire for that. Do you really want to carry the baggage for the entire 5.0-RELEASE and 5-STABLE branch? Just because of a pedantic policy point? Personally, I think that sucks. :-( Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102130111.f1D1BpU56116>