Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 04:45:44 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> Cc: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@Nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu>, FreeBSD ports list <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports/print/ghostscript4 Message-ID: <7916.838899944@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 Aug 1996 14:46:34 %2B0300." <Pine.BSF.3.91.960801144006.15927C-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > They should! Over the weekend I installed 2.1.5-R and 82 megs of > > > packages. With my fascist root umask, over half the ports were installed > How about the third way? Make a variable called PORTS_SET_UMASK or > something. It will allow those who always (or just sometimes) forget to > change their umask so that the port will be usable for "mere mortals"? If you read the original poster's message again, you'll note that he was complaining about packages being installed with a fascist umask, and whether or not pkg_add should set the umask. The ports hack won't help this case. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7916.838899944>