Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 10:34:05 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>, Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using a larger block size on large filesystems Message-ID: <20011208103405.D11428@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200112080400.fB8403P00383@apollo.backplane.com>; from dillon@apollo.backplane.com on Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 08:00:03PM -0800 References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011207214719.57264G-100000@fledge.watson.org> <200112080400.fB8403P00383@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 08:00:03PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > I strongly disagree with MDing /tmp. It's a hugely bad idea. I know you've mentioned this before. Are there technical reasons behind this? I believe you mentioned something about the buffer cache? Would you be willing to add it as an option since so many others seem to want it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011208103405.D11428>