Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 02 Jul 2020 06:49:02 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 246107] c++: note: diagnostic msg:
Message-ID:  <bug-246107-7788-YZ6pEvAX13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-246107-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-246107-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246107

Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |danfe@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #2 from Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> ---
Both ports build just fine for me on my i386 desktop with fairly recent
-CURRENT and in the 11.3-RELEASE tinderbox.  I'm afraid you did not provide
enough information for us to make more or less accurate guess about what mi=
ght
be causing the build problems you encounter.  At least "uname -a" output is
needed.

Building with BATCH=3DYES suggests that you're quite happy with default opt=
ions
for both ports.  If that's the case, is there some special reason why you c=
an't
simply use prebuilt packages (e.g., "pkg install gdb subversion")?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246107-7788-YZ6pEvAX13>