Date: 29 Jul 2005 20:45:59 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Glenn Dawson <glenn@antimatter.net>, BlackBsd@Mountain.net Subject: Re: Is Kern/Pr 58045 really fixed? Message-ID: <44br4l5dfc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEBHFCAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> References: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEBHFCAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> writes: > One reason bugs get closed is that the submitters don't respond > to requests from the developers for further info. A status of > closed should not be interpreted to mean any bug was corrected. In this case, it *does* mean that the patch from the PR was committed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44br4l5dfc.fsf>