Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:37:30 -0400
From:      John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        Bram Schoenmakers <bramschoenmakers@xs4all.nl>
Subject:   Re: 'nodump' on directories: new contents still dumped
Message-ID:  <200703151437.30390.lists@jnielsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <200703151857.19679.bramschoenmakers@xs4all.nl>
References:  <200703151857.19679.bramschoenmakers@xs4all.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 15 March 2007 13:57, Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
> I'm using dump(8) for backing up a FreeBSD 4.10 server. In order to
> decrease the resulting file size, I flagged some directories like
> /usr/ports and /usr/src with 'nodump'. I adjusted the dump level 0 script
> to have -h 0, so that worked fine. The other scripts for dumps >0 do not
> have a -h flag set, because -h 1 is default.
>
> The problem is that new files appearing in the /usr/ports tree (daily
> portsnap cron) do not have the 'nodump' flag set. But despite the 'nodump'
> flag on the /usr/ports directory, the new files in the tree are still
> dumped.
>
> I understood that dump does not enter directories with 'nodump' flag set,
> so it shouldn't see the new files inside, right? Or is this behavior
> implemented in a newer version than FreeBSD 4.10? I have scanned the CVS
> logs for dump, but couldn't find anything relevant.

Read the dump manpage more carefully, and pay particular attention to the -h 
flag. You probably want '-h0'.

JN



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200703151437.30390.lists>