Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com>
To:        n_hibma@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        nsayer@quack.kfu.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: hid_report_size() prototype wrong in both -stable and -current
Message-ID:  <1087.207.5.33.65.987532780.squirrel@medusa.kfu.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0104171815120.85224-100000@henny.webweaving.org>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.31.0104171815120.85224-100000@henny.webweaving.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> usb.h != libusb.h
> 
> NetBSD has a stupid naming convention. Use libusb.h in FreeBSD.

Ok. That's as may be, but then why are there prototypes for libusb calls in
dev/usb.h?

> 
> The prototypes are correct as is.

They may be in libusb.h, but the prototype for that function in
sys/dev/usb.h is mysterious.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1087.207.5.33.65.987532780.squirrel>