Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:18:49 +0100
From:      Mathieu CHATEAU <gollum123@free.fr>
To:        Dominique Goncalves <dominique.goncalves@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   [RESOLVED] Re[2]: portupgrade from bin 9.3.1 to 9.3.2
Message-ID:  <1803146722.20060114221849@free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <7daacbbe0601140303p207b7a64x6d3e39042db34272@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <822293652.20060114105311@free.fr> <7daacbbe0601140303p207b7a64x6d3e39042db34272@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Saturday, January 14, 2006, 12:03:47 PM, you wrote:

DG> Hi,
DG> On 1/14/06, Mathieu CHATEAU <gollum123@free.fr> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> i have done a portupgrade -Rr bind9 on a server.
>>
>> bind 9.3.1 was in /usr/sbin/named, but
>> bind 9.3.2 is in /usr/local/sbin/named
>>
>> Now, i have 2 bind9 version on the same system...
>>
>> any way to cleanup ? did i miss something ?

DG> pkg_delete the bind 9.3.2 port installation, and install bind 9.3.2
DG> with this option WITH_PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9=YES in your make.conf

DG> HTH.

>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mathieu CHATEAU

DG> Regards.


it works, thanks !

/etc/rc.d/named still gives some errors :

/etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: $command_interpreter -c != ELF
[: /usr/sbin/named: unexpected operator
Starting named.

named is started anyway. I have read somewhere that named shoud now be
controlled by rndc directly : why not change named.conf to use rndc to
still have a startup script ?

Mathieu CHATEAU





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1803146722.20060114221849>