Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:31:31 +0000 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org> To: Joe Holden <jwh@rewt.org.uk> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Atheros 9280 Issues Message-ID: <7FC5DA08-0119-42D8-9185-DBC56DF80324@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0911152034130.27002@jasmine.barbary> References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0911101400430.6578@jasmine.barbary> <5F4CC8D8-3FAB-405C-A94D-4950D13F7E98@freebsd.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0911150247590.27002@jasmine.barbary> <3B334B9B-54CE-4DB1-A010-9477A75D7BE1@freebsd.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0911152034130.27002@jasmine.barbary>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 Nov 2009, at 20:35, Joe Holden wrote: > Hiya, >=20 > This patch doesn't seem to apply to the tree (with original = ah_regdomain.c checked out using csup): >=20 > Patching file ah_regdomain.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 failed at 170. > Hunk #2 failed at 433. > Hunk #3 failed at 1683. >=20 > Should I be using any special options? Your CWD must be sys/dev/ath/ath_hal/ -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7FC5DA08-0119-42D8-9185-DBC56DF80324>