Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:56:46 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0imun_Mikecin?= <numisemis@gmail.com> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Impossible compression ratio on ZFS Message-ID: <BANLkTinGNetJn=W9RuoUp44QGyRqHQ1wvw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3DA28334D5774636A0DDEB48D8A43A91@multiplay.co.uk> References: <F21D6DCDBA494B4A9FDF20A13BC4947A@multiplay.co.uk> <20110613094803.GA10290@icarus.home.lan> <BANLkTikDXHwk_P-6rdoZYRVcqGnOCwXoMg@mail.gmail.com> <3DA28334D5774636A0DDEB48D8A43A91@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/6/13 Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> > Using 'du' for file sizes (without -A option) is wrong in the first place. >> Any program or script that is using it in such a way is broken and should >> be >> corrected. >> > > That's not true, -A displays the apparent size not the actual disk usage > which is what we want. Disk usage is not equal to file size. 'ls -al' shows file size, 'du' shows disk usage. Use the one you need, but don't expect them to be the same thing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTinGNetJn=W9RuoUp44QGyRqHQ1wvw>