Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:56:21 -0700
From:      Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>
To:        Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Adding options to RPI-B
Message-ID:  <25D75461-E6FB-43C3-86AE-A513B02FA00D@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <42C259D6-F652-417A-80B5-536893D6D642@felyko.com>
References:  <CALCpEUEV2woA3qmQEGQCR0tZ%2B2fMX0xObw3b4F8_MDh51mODDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmoni3HTEsxXPh=7mrqJkZbX%2B6gPyAbaC7_P6F3m-E1H%2Bvg@mail.gmail.com> <2C57A72F-0CB3-41DF-B0E5-1509348128BD@freebsd.org> <42C259D6-F652-417A-80B5-536893D6D642@felyko.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Jul 24, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:

> On 24 Jul 2013, at 08:29, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
>> On Jul 23, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>=20
>>> .. I'd rather we just make modules support work, and start shipping
>>> stripped down kernels w/ modules.
>>=20
>> I've used modules; as far as I can tell, they work just fine.
>> The status quo is historical legacy.
>>=20
>>> We have loader support for arm, right? :)
>>=20
>> Would someone please commit the change to the
>> RPi kernel config to enable all modules by default?
>>=20
>> That will let us verify the current status before we start
>> removing things that are currently static.
>=20
>=20
> Done, r253634.


Rui:

Thanks!

Hiren and others:

Please try experimenting with modules on RPi and
BeagleBone and let folks here know what works and
doesn't work.  You should be able to:
 * Load modules manually
 * Load them from loader.conf
 * Load them from rc.conf
 * =85 etc ...

Tim





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25D75461-E6FB-43C3-86AE-A513B02FA00D>