Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:49:44 +0200 From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <Alex.Kovalenko@verizon.net> Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? Message-ID: <200410151649.45117.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> In-Reply-To: <1097850967.843.14.camel@RabbitsDen> References: <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <416EDA36.1070403@DeepCore.dk> <1097850967.843.14.camel@RabbitsDen>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El Viernes, 15 de Octubre de 2004 16:36, Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko=20 escribi=F3: > On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 15:57, S=F8ren Schmidt wrote: > > Chuck Swiger wrote: > > > Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > >> On Thursday 14 October 2004 12:59, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > >>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:51:41PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein > > >>> wrote: [ ...well made userland point snipped... ] > > >>> Unfortunately, due to the way ata and atapicam are implemented > > >>> right now, > > >>> this is unlikely to happen soon. > > >> ... > > Since I was one of the people responsible for using up space in > S=F8ren's mailbox in the past, I felt obliged to chime in -- my laptop > (AVERATEC 3150H) was complaining about ad0 and would eventually hang > if it had 'device atapicam'. I have disabled it and lived happily > thereafter. To be fair, I do not know if it still is the case. If > there is enough interest out there, I can plug it back in. > > However, I think this would be something to consider before making it > part of GENERIC kernel. > > FWIW. > --- > Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko. > Well, and something between? With module support going better and better, we'll try to distribute=20 some other kernel appart of GENERIC. This is now done by NetBSD and think that re makefiles support more than=20 GENERIC and install kernels. Have also a PC or a MOBILE kernel may be of interest. =2D- josemi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410151649.45117.josemi>