Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:10:55 -0700 From: joe <joe-dated-1035389534.144fdb@dubium.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Best practice when building a -STABLE branch kernel Message-ID: <200210180910.55374.joe@dubium.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is it a best practice to include debuging options in a -STABLE tree kernel? I have read the following article which suggests that a business-as- usual practice should be to include debugging options. >http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/03/21/Big_Scary_Daemons.html?page=1 The kernel developer's handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html) does not offer an opinion Is there some alternative thinking? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Sotham ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites by keeping them both and keeping them furious. - G.K. Chesterton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210180910.55374.joe>