Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:03:24 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: mayuresh@kathe.in Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Sending Tcsh to packages/ports ... Message-ID: <CAHu1Y70K=E-4EY6bjy9-59LCmX0a0u4ga2_mCywiTdmk4suW-w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <64780f09d4251b9641e3bca39000ae2d@kathe.in> References: <64780f09d4251b9641e3bca39000ae2d@kathe.in>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
*kudzu@hearst:/bin 130>* ll -i | grep csh 198147 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 427888 Jun 22 2018 csh* 198147 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 427888 Jun 22 2018 tcsh* On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:59 PM Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in> wrote: > Since Tcsh is usually imported, why not send it to packages/ports > collection? > I agree that "csh" is an historically important artifact, but do we need > to still rely on that? > I have been using "csh" ever since I started using FreeBSD, liked it, > but it doesn't feel light like plain old "sh" nor is as feature-full as > "bash". To top that, the installer asks me to choose between "csh" and > "tcsh" in-spite of being the same binary. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mah=C4=81bh=C4=81rata
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y70K=E-4EY6bjy9-59LCmX0a0u4ga2_mCywiTdmk4suW-w>