Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 02:54:54 +0000 From: David Bright <david_a_bright@dell.com> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "net@FreeBSD.org" <net@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: DHCPv6 Support in FreeBSD Base Message-ID: <DAE773AC-9D94-419E-82F4-FF5EBFF46BB5@DELL.com> In-Reply-To: <20160610.070822.525071082322626267.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <6224EC83-3A81-4CE7-83C5-674628F38958@DELL.com> <20160610.070822.525071082322626267.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 9, 2016, at 18:08, Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > I am concerned that by > replacing it completely we might be going to lose accumulated > improvements in our code though I do not have a complete list of them > nor closely look into the current ISC's code. If no one investigated > it, it need to be done. A fair point. > Is it difficult for us to think two clients for IPv4 and IPv6 > respectively? Importing a DHCPv6-only client looks much easier even > if we use ISC's code. I thought of that. It certainly would be possible, although it would mean t= wo clients providing essentially duplicate functionality, thereby leading t= o some bloat in the system image size. --=20 David A. Bright Storage Development Principal Engineer Dell | Compellent office +1 952 392 5861 Cube J-731, 7615 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 David_A_Bright@DELL.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DAE773AC-9D94-419E-82F4-FF5EBFF46BB5>