Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 14:40:01 GMT From: Nate Denning <nate.denning@gmail.com> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment Message-ID: <201305081440.r48Ee1TT008658@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/178116; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nate Denning <nate.denning@gmail.com> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 08:30:01 -0600 On May 1, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Nate Denning <nate.denning@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > On May 1, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 >> Nate, >>=20 >> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:26:04AM -0600, Nate Denning wrote: >> N> > do you run any additional network modules: ipfw, pf, netgraph, >> N> > accept filters, etc? How your system differes from a default >> N> > installation? >> N>=20 >> N> Yes, ipfilter, accf_http and accf_data (accf is for Apache). No = ipfw, pf, or netgraph. Output of kldstat: >>=20 >> I would suspect ipfilter. :( >>=20 >> Is it possible for you to rewrite your rules to ipfw or pf and try >> running with that? >>=20 >=20 > Certainly, I'll switch to pf and see how that goes. I switched to pf and I'm at about a week now with no panics where there = were typically several per day with ipfilter. I need this host to be = stable so I would like to stick to pf, but is there any more info, = configs, etc. I can provide to help debug the ipfilter issue? Thanks, Nate=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201305081440.r48Ee1TT008658>