Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:10:32 +0300 From: Igor Popov <Igor@Garant.Koenig.RU> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: natd and tun Message-ID: <200404021010.38113.Igor@Garant.Koenig.RU>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_tHRbATzI7lYQYEN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi,=20 I have a question: would be natd work with tun device? I had already asked= =20 this question when FreeBSD 5.2 were released Someone have answered to me that I should use ppp builtin nat, because dive= rt=20 sockets doesn't work with tun. Simple rules like this divert all from any to any via tun0 allow all from any to any did not work. Now I use ipfilter, but I prefer to use ipfw, it is more usab= le=20 on FreeBSD. Also there is OpenBSD' pf, but it is hard to use with dynamical= ly=20 created interfaces. =2D-=20 "I wish there was a knob on the TV to turn up the intelligence. There's a knob called `brightness', but it doesn't work." -- Gallagher --Boundary-02=_tHRbATzI7lYQYEN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iQEVAwUAQG0R7YE3+5OFEFEBAQGJRQf5AfnzBDEqnuIZqqZT+Rxb+pW4Yyb/UI5z JqXKxYM4dip5MPuTS4L8STHFTI2jfn4dBDlmoF57yZ28g/82asxJmxxG9iYHngic cTD+8Bd9zjpfqP/ELcX0VcaQKXCDxBm2o05WK9yPVYDuQ/qiVHU0/by61Ol3rnB8 Uf0vp2n8+QKtM/GWacprT/8sq8w6KfvBpHFP/veypbbpXB36gig9hx2nQCJjSsAH KvotosMKCV/b8Q4wY5gfnvLJZXINB02mTTB1+JHsGFJA6/uVvthoNdY8tQTVkZyh lEbH9ih0d94iR6BrKEPBZa59YI4unudhiFCWEKlppq3vVkvWgBcVuQ== =xf/5 -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --Boundary-02=_tHRbATzI7lYQYEN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404021010.38113.Igor>