Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 23:24:02 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd@hopf.math.purdue.edu (Clarence Wilkerson) Cc: current@freebsd.org, wilker@hopf.math.purdue.edu Subject: Re: More on NEC diffs in scsiconf.c Message-ID: <199601262224.XAA20785@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199601261905.OAA07332@hopf.math.purdue.edu> from "Clarence Wilkerson" at Jan 26, 96 02:05:02 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Clarence Wilkerson wrote:
> Thanks for the suggested diffs. As given, there is a complaint
> in the compile for -current. It appears that the data structures
> have included another field since the diffs suggested were test.
> The compile complaint and comparison to other entries suggest that
> this should be
> {T_READONLY, T_READONLY, T_REMOV, "NCR", "MBR-7" .........}.
> for -current .
Yup. In order to provide support for weird devices that claim to be
something else than they actually are (magneto-optical drives that
claim to be T_DIRECT, CD recorders that pretend T_READONLY (CD-ROM)),
i've included an additional field there in -current. The first one is
used to match the device (together with the vendor and model strings),
while the second one assigns it to a particular driver.
--
cheers, J"org
joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601262224.XAA20785>